ABSTRACT
The broad objective of the study was to investigate the socio-economic and cultural dimensions of food security among selected ethnic groups in North Central Nigeria. Specifically, the study was designed to: determine food culture and practices of the respondents; determine the household food security status (energy availability) across ethnic groups; determine dietary diversity of the households across cultures; identify perceived constraints militating against household food security; and describe the coping strategies utilized by the households during food shortages. Seven hypotheses and a conceptual framework were developed for the study. The population of the study consists of all ethnic groups in North Central Nigeria. The zone comprises about 60 ethnic groups. Specifically, the study was carried out among Tiv, Igala and Eggon ethnic groups of Benue, Kogi and Nasarawa States. A multi-stage sampling technique was adopted for the study. Three ethnic groups (Tiv, Igala and Eggon) and one village per ethnic group were purposively selected based on differences in language and culture. The total sample size for this study was 340 respondents, made up of 120 Tiv households, 108 Igala households and 112 Eggon households. Data for the study were collected through the use of interview schedule. The data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean score, food security index, factor analysis; the comparative (reduced) coping strategy index (CSI), logit regression, Kruskal-Wallis (H) statistic and correlation. The study revealed that majority (91.2%) of the respondents were males. The mean age of the respondents was 43.36 years while their mean household size was 5 members. The mean farm size of the respondents was 3.3 hectares while their average fertilizer use was 4.73kg/ha per annum. Majority (53.2%) had no formal education; majority (89.4%) had no access to credit and about 53.2% did not participate in non-farm activities. The average output from own production was 6211.79kg and majority (60%) of the respondents possessed goats. The mean farm income; mean non-farm income and average annual household income for the respondents were 69,539.00 naira; 22,486.00 naira and 91,752.00 naira, respectively. Majority (93.2%) of husbands took decisions on household agricultural activities; all respondents practiced subsistence farming; and 94.7% practiced mixed cropping. Majority (88.6%) of the respondents preferred major crops; about 92.5% acquired farmland through inheritance; and the family (67. %) constituted the main source of labour. Majority of the respondents used traditional processing (97.4%) and storage (96.2%) methods. Majority (95.4%) of husbands controlled household income and majority (77.9%) of husbands as well had preference in household food sharing. About 67.5%, 41.7% and 44.6% in Anter, Ikem and Randa, respectively were food secure. In all, slightly above half (51.8%) of the households were food secure. Root and tuber crops (86.2%) constituted the food group most consumed by households. Consequently, the population had a low quality diet. The major constraints to food security in the study area included economic constraints, institutional constraints, poor governance and lack of access to appropriate technologies. The most popular strategies utilized during food stress were relying on less preferred food (93.8%) and limiting portion size at meal times (83.5%). The regression analysis showed that some household socio-economic factors [household size (AE) (t= -7.64; p ≤ 0.05), output from own production (t=2.89; p ≤ 0.05), farm income (t=2.78; p ≤ 0.05) and annual income (t= 2.21; p ≤ 0.05)] significantly influenced household food security status. Regression analysis also showed that some food culture and practices [control over household income (-1.056; p ≤ 0.05) and preference over household food sharing (0.834; p ≤ 0.05)] significantly influenced household food security status. Kruskal-Wallis (H) analysis indicated that there was no significant (x2 statistic=5.9915; p ≤ 0.05) difference in household food security status among the ethnic groups studied. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant (r = – 0.71; p ≤ 0.05) relationship between food security and coping strategy index. Also, some household socio-economic factors such as household size (AE) (r=0.611; p ≤ 0.05); age (r=0.222; p ≤ 0.05) and annual household income (r= -0.197; p ≤ 0.05) had significant relationship with coping strategy index. The study recommended that to improve the food security situation in North Central Nigeria, multiple cropping found to be dominant in the region should be encouraged. Research and extension should focus on developing and promoting appropriate technologies, including use of inputs that can raise productivity in mixed cropping system. Also, governments should support appropriate food storage, processing and preservation techniques at the household and village levels to ensure food availability throughout the year. In addition, households should be assisted to diversify their income sources and enhance their purchasing power so as to meet their minimum food requirement. Furthermore, extension institutions in the region should organize nutrition education programmes aimed at encouraging farmers to produce and consume varieties of foods for improved nutrition and food security.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background information
Food security is the condition in which all people, at all times, have physical, social, and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food which meets their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life (FAO, 2002). It is also defined as access by all people at all times to enough food for an active and healthy life (World Bank, 1986). Food security depends on availability of food, access to food, utilization of food or nutritional factors and stability of food supply (Gross, Schultink and Kliemmann, 1999; FAO, 2008a). These dimensions are in turn dependent on agricultural production, food imports and donations, employment opportunities and income earnings, intra-household decision-making and resource allocation, health care utilization and caring practices (Maxwell and Frankenberger, 1992) combined with the broader factors of physical, policy and social environment (Hoddinott, 2001). Food insecurity on the other hand connotes a situation in which people lack basic food intake to provide them with the energy and nutrients for fully productive lives.
Concerns over the food security situation in the world are reflected in the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) of eradicating extreme poverty and hunger, including reducing by half the proportion of people who suffer from hunger between 1990 and 2015. In 2010, an estimated 925 million people in the world were hungry, of which 907 million or 98 percent were in developing countries. This situation has been attributed to neglect of agriculture relevant to very poor people by governments and international agencies; the current worldwide economic crisis and the significant increase of food prices (FAO, 2010); World Hunger Education Service (WHES), 2011). Hunger is exacerbated by poverty as about 1.4 billion people in developing countries live on $1.25 a day or less (International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), 2011).
The prevalence of undernutrition in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) declined slightly from 31 percent between 1990 and 1992 to 29 percent in 2000/2002 and decreased again to 27 percent between 2006 and 2008 (FAO, 2011a). Even with the decline, about 239 million people in SSA continue to face chronic hunger (WHES, 2011) largely because of high level of poverty resulting from overdependence on subsistence agriculture, limited access to off-farm employment, sluggish development in urban areas and skewed income distribution (FAO, 2006). As a result, more than one in every four Africans is undernourished, and the inability to consistently acquire enough calories and nutrients for a healthy and productive life is pervasive (United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), (2012). This is in spite of ample agricultural land, plenty of water and a generally favourable climate for growing food.
The food security situation in Nigeria has slightly improved, though the progress is slow. The monitoring report on progress towards hunger reduction targets of the World Food Summit (WFS) and the Nigeria Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) indicated that there was slight increase in per capita daily calorie intake of Nigerians from 2310 kcal between 1990 and1992 to 2560 kcal in 2000/2002 and it increased again to 2710 kcal between 2006 and 2008. Similarly, the number of undernourished people decreased from 16.3 million people between 1990 and 1992 to 11.9 million in 2000/2002 and further declined to 9.4 million people between 2006 and 2008 (FAO, 2011a). Furthermore, the report on Nigeria MDGs by the Federal Government of Nigeria (2010) indicated that the proportion of underweight children reduced from 35.7 percent in 1990 to 23.1 percent in 2008, which is less than the regional average of 28 percent for SSA countries (UNCTAD, 2010).
Despite the improved statistics, Nigeria faces a challenge in meeting the basic food needs of its population. The possible reason for the persistent food security problems in Nigeria, despite huge earnings from oil, is the neglect of the agricultural sector, following the discovery of oil in commercial quantity (Akpan, 2009). More than half of all employment in Nigeria depends on agriculture, but 90 percent of the produce comes from small rain-fed farms of a few hectares, constrained by poor infrastructure and little access to credit. Many of these farms are unable to meet their own subsistence requirements, exposing families to volatile prices in the market. Moreover, the Nigeria population has been on the increase from 88.9 million people in 1991 to 168 million people in 2011 (National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), 2012), leading to a high dependency ratio and pressure on resources.
Agricultural growth rate has been on the decline since 2007. Food growth rate was 7.2 percent in 2007, decreased sharply to 6.3 percent in 2008, declined slightly to 5.9 in 2009 and further declined to 5.7 percent in 2010. However, the population increase within the same period (2007-2010) was constant at 3.2 percent (Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), 2010). Although agricultural growth rate for the period (2007-2010) was higher than the population increases, this did not translate into a commensurate improvement of food security at the household and national levels. As a result, household food insecurity, under-nutrition and micronutrient deficiencies are found throughout Nigeria, with important differences based on agro-ecology, access to government services, rural or urban location and socio-economic factors. The type of food security problem in Nigeria is a combination of widespread chronic food insecurity resulting from continuing or structural poverty and transitory (seasonal) food insecurity, which occurs in hungry periods of April to August, particularly in northern region.
In addition to socio-economic factors are cultural practices which contribute directly or indirectly to the food security situation of a given society. Culture is defined as the way of life of a particular society and it refers to the roles, uses, position and symbolism of individuals, ideas and objects such as food in all aspects of a society, including beliefs, values, norms, taboos, institutions, language, rituals and arts (Byaruhanga and Opedum, 2008). The culture of a place is intrinsically linked to the food consumed in the region as culture prescribes the interaction between people and land and between land and food (Ashish, Ashish, Najeeb and Sudhir, 2008; Byaruhanga and Opedum, 2008). Cultural practices and tradition impact on land ownership, access to productive resources, the organization of agricultural production and nutrition (Villarreal, 2000). Furthermore, the specific socio-cultural norms that govern control over income and household food allocation can influence access to food (World Bank, 2009).
North Central Nigeria often referred to as the middle belt, comprises about two- fifths of the country’s land area but supporting less than one-fifth of the total population as a greater part of the region is uninhabited owing to poor soil and climate (http://www.britannica.com/EB-checked/topic/414840/Nigeria/214164/Agriculture- forestry-and-fishing). The region is known for its diversity of ethnic groups, including the Ibira, Nupe, Gwari, Eggon, Pyem, Goemai, Kofyar, Jukun, Igala, Idoma and Tiv who obtain their living from agricultural production. However, most are small-scale subsistence farmers who produce only a little surplus for sale and who derive additional income from one or more cash crops, livestock and petty trading. Farms are generally small, usually less than 5 hectares and relying on the use of manual labour and crude implements such as hoe and matchet. Like other regions of the country, the population is growing rapidly and urbanization is accelerating, leading to worsening food deficit despite government efforts to rectify the situation.
1.2 Problem statement
The ability of most households in rural Nigeria to generate a sufficient income, which together with own production, can be used to meet food needs is undermined due to poor economic conditions and the systems of agricultural production, distribution and utilization. An estimated 69 percent or 112,470 million people in Nigeria live below the poverty line and both income and human poverty are increasing (NBS, 2012). Using the Human Development Index (HDI) as a measure of the quality of life, Nigeria was ranked 156 out of 187 countries in the low human development category in 2011 (United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 2011). Similarly, Nigeria’s Global Hunger Index (GHI) value for 2011 was 15.5 and ranked 18 out of the 81 developing countries with extremely alarming, alarming or serious hunger situation (IFPRI, 2011). These results point to the fact that human vulnerability in the country is set to worsen in future leading to increasing poverty and food insecurity. Poverty and food insecurity within Nigeria are predominantly a rural phenomenon with over 70 percent of the poor and hungry located in the strongly agriculture-based rural areas. Statistics show that the incidence of poverty in Nigeria using the absolute poverty measure increased from 54.7 percent in 2004 to 60.9 percent in 2010. Nationally, the food energy poverty incidence was higher among the poor (52 percent) than the non-poor (48 percent). It was also higher among the rural poor (66.1 percent) than the non-poor (33.9 percent). Disaggregation by geopolitical zone indicate that the poor in North East, North West, North Central, South East and South South zones had a higher incidence of food energy poverty than the non-poor. This was however different in South West where the incidence of food energy poverty was higher among the non-poor than the poor (NBS, 2012). Overall, the food energy poverty was higher in the northern part of the country than in the south.
Poverty has serious effects on food and nutrition security. It contributes to poor agricultural productivity, as many Nigerian farmers cannot afford yield-enhancing inputs (such as fertilizer, pesticides, and improved seeds), which would help to increase productivity. As a result of low agricultural productivity, farmers are unable to earn enough income to purchase the food required to live a healthy and productive life. However, agriculture is the principal source of food and livelihood in Nigeria, contributing over 40 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP), and employing about two thirds of the nation’s workforce. Given the role of agriculture in the Nigerian economy, poverty and food insecurity could be attributed to poor performance of the agricultural sector, which in turn creates food supply and access problems at the household and national levels.
Nigeria was a major agricultural exporter before embarking on off-shore oil drilling in the 1960s; but as it developed into the world’s twelfth largest oil producing country (The World Factbook in Wikipedia, 2012), its farms and plantations were neglected and today, about 90 percent of Nigeria’s agricultural output comes from inefficient small scale subsistence farms and most farmers have little or no access to modern inputs. Nigeria is a net importer of agricultural goods, particularly rice, wheat and sugar, which the country could potentially produce in large enough quantities to be self- sufficient. For instance, Nigeria occupied the second place among the top 10 global rice importers in 2008/2010 with 1.8 metric tons (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2011). Furthermore, Nigeria’s agricultural imports accounted for over USD3 billion in 2009 while agricultural exports were about USD1.4 billion.
Analyses of a number of food security crises in Africa, including Nigeria over the past few years have highlighted the reality that a number of factors, including socio- economic and cultural factors, play a role in food security (Omonona, Bolarin and Agoi, 2007; Omotesho, Adewumi, Muhammad-Lawal and Ayinde, 2006; Benson, 2006; World Bank, 2009; Thandi, Matwa and Bradlay, 2006; Byaruhanga and Opedum, 2008; Nganwa, 2009). The socio-economic characteristics and resources of individual households have been identified as factors influencing the food security status of households (Sen, 1981; Babatunde, Omotesho and Sholotan, 2007). Rural households continue to face poor economic conditions which impact on their living standards and food security situation. The returns to land in terms of output have been on the decrease especially where increased population and non-agricultural uses compete for land use, creating gaps in resource availability among poor households and leading to worse household food security situation coupled with youth dislocation from farms for off-farm activities (Akinsanmi and Droppler, 2005). Similarly, some aspects of cultural practices have been identified as important factors influencing food security (Byaruhanga and Opedum, 2008; Thandi, Matwa and Bradlay, 2006; Onuaroh and Ayo, 2003; Nganwa, 2009; Nwajuiba and Okechukwu, 2006; Hagg, 2006). Culture impacts on food and nutrition security through the systems of crop production, distribution and utilization (Villarreal, 2000; Hagg, 2006; Byaruhanga and Opedum, 2008). In addition, ethnicity is related to food security because the environments where people live and their ancestral origins influence food culture and practices with food and food cultures passed on from one generation to another (Byaruhanga and Opedum, 2008). Furthermore, rural households consume and prefer the crops that are supported and produced in the specific geographical regions (Ashish et al., 2008). Thus, understanding these processes is critical to the understanding and devising of appropriate interventions in agriculture and food security. However, review of recent literature has shown the existence of little work on the link between socio-economic factors, food culture and practices and household food security (energy availability) among ethnic groups in North Central Nigeria. Hence, the need to ascertain the influence of socio-economic and cultural factors on household food security status of selected ethnic groups in North Central Nigeria.
In the light of the foregoing, this study was designed to provide answers to the following questions: How does culture influence household food security? What is the household food security situation of the selected ethnic groups? How diversified are the diets of the households of the selected ethnic groups? What factors militate against household food security in the study area? How do rural households respond to food shortages?
1.3 Purpose of the study
The purpose of the study was to assess the socio-economic and cultural dimensions of food security among selected ethnic groups in North Central Nigeria. Specifically, the study was designed to:
i. determine food culture and practices of the respondents;
ii. determine the household food security status (energy availability) across ethnic groups;
iii. determine dietary diversity of the households across cultures;
iv. identify perceived constraints militating against household food security; and
v. describe the coping strategies utilized by the households during food shortages.
1.4 Hypotheses of the study
The following research hypotheses were tested.
i. Selected socio-economic factors have no significant influence on ethnic groups’ household food security status (energy availability);
ii. Selected food culture and practices have no significant influence on ethnic groups’ household food security status (energy availability);
iii. There is no significant difference in household food security status (energy availability) among the selected ethnic groups;
iv. There is no significant relationship between household food security and dietary diversity of the rural households;
v. There is no significant relationship between household food security and coping strategies utilized by households during food shortage;
vi. There is no significant relationship between household socio-economic factors and dietary diversity score; and
vii. There is no significant relationship between household socio-economic factors and coping strategy index.
1.5 Significance of the study
Ensuring the basic food needs of her population is one of the major challenges confronting Nigeria. Knowledge of the socio-economic and cultural factors influencing food security is important in understanding and devising of appropriate interventions in agriculture and food security. The findings of the study would bring to fore the food security situation, as a basis for future policy formulation and project design by government and private organizations. It is intended that the findings of this study would assist agricultural extension agencies understand and devise appropriate interventions in agriculture and food security that are suitable to the diverse cultural settings of farmers in the study area. It is also hoped that the findings of this study would help development agencies, including agricultural extension organizations target food insecure communities and ethnic groups for participation in food security interventions. The results of the study would assist efforts by nutritionists to direct changes in food consumption patterns for optimal nutritional conditions. If adopted, the findings of this study would assist the Nigerian government re-strategize and develop an approach that would ensure better progress toward achieving the first Millennium Development Goal (MDG) of reducing the number of food insecure by half by 2015. Finally, the result of this study will be of immense use to future researchers.
This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research
SOCIO-ECONOMIC AND CULTURAL ANALYSES OF FOOD SECURITY AMONG SELECTED ETHNIC GROUPS IN NORTH CENTRAL NIGERIA>
Project 4Topics Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project
Chat Us on WhatsApp » 09132600555
DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:
09132600555 (Country Code: +234)
YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]
09132600555 (Country Code: +234)