CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
Background of the Study
Art expression in term of materials has experienced levels of changes as a result of the revolution earlier started with the emergence of Renaissance Art in Europe. The rise of the rich middle class, alongside people of means, supported scholarship. The initial method of acquiring knowledge in art creation was through apprenticeship. Young aspiring artists received the skills in the studios of established artists. Apprenticeship as a system faded out with time. Schools being accepted as means of massive enlightenment started springing up in different parts of Europe. Saxton (1981) notes that the first formal art school in the west was established in 1562 in Florence, Italy, while in England, the Royal Academy was established in 1768. By the eighteenth century, schools in Europe had increased to a hundred. The author notes that irrespective of where the art school was located, the emphasis was the need to stimulate the creativity of the individuals. The focus was the development of the full imaginative potential of the aspiring artists by exposing them to a wide range of media. Explorations and experiments led to diversification of the media of expression. Colour as a medium, for instance, with its different attractions to artists, occupied a commanding position for the diversity in their individual expressions. The shades of colours in their varieties were made to change and shift about in the quest by artists for greater dynamic unity. Variety further offers different approaches in order to gain more satisfaction. The desire for satisfaction was later extended to other media of expression. De la Croix and Tansey (1980), having assessed the periodical changes, state thus: For Europe, the nineteenth century was an age of radical change during which the modern world took shape. In a world experiencing a population explosion of unprecedented magnitude, revolution follows upon revolution, punctuated by counter-revolution and conservative reactions … The revolutionary shakeups of authority reverberate through the century, carrying the hope of people for something newer, better, truer, and purer. As search for fresh media and concepts to effect the change in expression was intensified, Reid (1975), notes that some artists explored and experimented extensively and the outcome of the explorations and experimentations was the exhibition of diversity on their works. For instance, in 1786, one of the leading Neo-Classicist painters, John Zoffany, came out with a completely different type of literary illustration titled ―Charles Macklin as Shylock‖, a portrait study of an actor playing a part on the stage. The range of art creation was expanding by the development of other more peculiar types of art expression. By combining industrial and scientific subjects on one composition to achieve the contrast effect of light, Joseph Wright of Derby‘s ―Experiment with the Air-Air Pump‖ was a compelling art piece. In 1848, when Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was formed by Holman Hunt and his colleagues, the author observes that the group felt dissatisfied with the state of the art in England because it seemed to lack vigour, sincerity and seriousness. This became obvious when the works were put in contrast with the quality of the art in Italy and northern Europe before the time of Raphael. The artists attributed the weakness to neglect of nature and over-dependence, instead, on academic conventions. To address this, they initiated ―a child-like‖ reversion from existing schools to nature herself. The artists displayed differing interests by evolving different media and techniques of art expression which changed the face of art expression in England. This was as a result of Holman Hunt‘s insistence on remarkable powers of observation and pictorial invention. The emergence of Impressionists and the Post-Impressionists in the art scene witnessed the exhibition of the most recent of the series of masterpieces of paintings from the thirteenth to the nineteenth century. Their paintings, whose focus was to find a new truth, were derided, hated or ignored purely on moral grounds. The artists deliberately evolved diversification and innovation in the process of their art creation. This accelerated art in the way that is comparable with the rate in the fields of science and technology. Cezanne, for example, spent years working in isolation appropriating different media in order to reconcile his perceptions with the relationships of touches of colour on the flat picture surface. The artist, through experiment, understood that the appearance of objects change as the eye moves over and around it. This was largely because of the media and techniques he devised to integrate the picture-surface so that all the shapes on it were made to relate to one another, which consequently led to Cubism, an abstract art of the century. Gauguin, another artist, turned against the rationalism and materialism of his period and went to live in Tahiti, where he was moved by the simplicity and mystery of the way of life of the peasants and natives. The artist tried to find an equivalent to this in his diverse painting. Another artist who evolved improvisations in his art production was Rodin. He strived to give his forms new freedom, sometimes bridging them in space. A group of painters (Henri Matisse, Andre Derain, and Albert Marquet, among many) came together and staged an exhibition in 1905. The artists was named fauves (wild beasts) because of their approaches. The painters rejected traditional rendering of three-dimensional space defined by colours. They used vivid, non-naturalistic and exuberant media. Colours, raw from the tubes, were applied and forms were aggressively manipulated to the point of distortion. The work from Henri Matisse titled ―Woman with the Hat‖ is a typical example of the characteristics of the works of the Fauvists. Their works displayed at an exhibition were appalling to the viewers and were subjected to mockery and abuse at the time. Henri Matisse developed an entirely new approach to art expression in terms of art materials and techniques when he was ill. Different shapes of colours were cut from papers and coloured in gouache. These were pasted on a ground by assistants under his watch. An example of this is the work titled ―L‘Escargot‖, produced and exhibited in 1953. In his study, Stokstad (1995) notes that Pablo Picasso joined a group of young writers and artists, interested in progressive art and politics. He also gathered experiences from other artists because of his frequent visits to their studios. In 1912 Pablo Picasso was pre-occupied with creating works with more clearly-discernible materials. The approach led to what was later known as ―Synthetic Cubism‖, particularly the work titled ―Glass and Bottle of Suze‖, composed of separate elements pasted together. At the centre of the composition is the combination of newsprint and construction arrangement of paper cut to suggest a tray or round table upon which are glass and a bottle of liquor. The author observes that this approach of art rendition was carried to the point of complete abstraction, although a few allusions to objects still remained. Pablo Picasso‘s compositions started showing flat planes being replaced by other flat materials. His focus was shifted to composing works with machines and machine-made objects. Cubism as a movement stimulated other similar movements. Prominent among these, was Futurism, founded in Italy by a poet, Marinetti. Reid (1975), states that unlike other previous movements, Futurism was propagandised in words, as well as in paintings and sculpture materials. The artists of this movement created works with the sole aim of destroying the art of the past which was seen as oppressive to the young artists, especially in Italy. The Futurists hoped to substitute a new art based on speed, violence and machines. The artists were deliberately and aggressively revolutionary in the use of materials and techniques. They took materials from Pointillism and, much later, from Cubism, where they came up with multiple images in one composition. Radical approach to art creation was witnessed during the World Wars when some Swiss artists under the Dada Art Movement sought to overturn what they regarded as ―outworn aesthetic standard‖. The group individually appropriated large portions of unconventional materials for art creation. They believed that art could be made of anything, even rubbish (Reid, 1975). Gradually, the excitement that was expressed by the public at the emergence of the movement lost its power to shock any longer. Other Dada artists like Max Ernst and Ben Nicholson exploited the environment and came out with materials as mugs, jugs and bottles as suitable materials which they used for their art expression. According to Getlein (2002) the artists loved these materials because of their simplicity and the fact that they were well known to everyone and could be understood from a simple profile. Artists continued their search for the best means of expression as best as they could. For instance, a French painter, Jean Dubuffet, developed a very different but distinct form of art expression. His art creation was inspired by what he called ―Art Brut‖ (raw art), where materials of uncommon backgrounds were mixed with tar, sand, and mud and manipulated to produce works. The tempo of radical changes in Europe and America opened up a modern epoch in art creations. Artists from Europe who settled in America because of the World Wars continued the quest for new concepts, materials, and techniques. New York School played a major role in the emergence of new concepts of art expression in America and beyond. For instance, Jackson Pollock, one of the outstanding abstract Expressionists, rejected much of the European art tradition of aesthetic refinement for cruder and rougher materials, an approach akin to Jean Dubuffet of France except for their materiality. Gina (2007), states that where there is an idea, there is a way to express it (irrespective of which part of the world the artist is coming from). To do this, artists exploited the environment and created art out of non-regular materials just to portray their love for art and the skills employed in its expression. For instance, Anastasia Elias used toilet paper rolls to create miniature scenes of life. In a similar development, Erika Irish Simmons liked to gather and preserve old technology such as cassette tapes that were no longer being used. She used these unconventional materials to create popular celebrity portraits. Stanislav Aristov from Russia used burnt matchsticks and bent them to his desired shapes before editing photographs of them via Photoshop, where delightful scenes were created. In another development, old watch parts were the most suitable materials used by Susan Beatrice to create steam punk sculpture. She mainly used recycled parts which coincided with her love for nature. Another innovative artist was Kseniya Simonova, who used sand to create animated stories. From the pile of sand, the artist could push, rub and pinch sand into accents that translated into beautiful depictions. Paul Vilinski is another visual artist that used discarded materials such as beer cans to bring out his artwork in meaningful poetic ways. The artist‘s concern for environment issues can be seen in his works, as he often used recycled materials, giving them new breaths of life as art pieces. Grant (2009) observes that with the introduction of new materials, the admixture of the materials and the fair number of exploration, as well as experimentations by artists, fresh reasons for new art movements were being stimulated. The author stressed further that artists were in search of unique and best materials and techniques to express themselves, and to communicate with the public. The new discoveries and inventions accelerated the pace of art redefinition and development as newer and better media of expressions kept coming to limelight. The impact of the artistic transformation went beyond the boundaries of Europe. This was first felt in the regions colonized by the individual European countries. This became possible because of the relationships established through the policy of colonization. The non-European world began witnessing inflows of cultures strange to them. Gradually, the western nations established their kinds of values in these territories. The world started witnessing the interpretation of artistic issues from a western world view point. In Africa, for example, and especially in Nigeria, one fact that seems settled is that the European style of art expression as known today evolved with Aina Onabolu (1882-1963), who not only excelled, but who also carved a niche for himself in pioneering art education in the country. It is observed that before 1910, not much was going on in terms of modern (European technique) art expression in the West African sub-region. Before then, Nigerians were creating purely indigenous arts, free of influence by any outside art-making ideas. Works interlaced with the basic materials to create art used as a vehicle to convey spiritual concerns for survival (Egonwa 1994). Babalola (2004) notes that Nigeria has a flourishing art history, and that before Onabolu could venture into the European art expression, he had interacted with, and was used to, the types of forms in Nigeria, as art was highly appreciated by the Nigerian people. Also, Babalola posits that Onabolu knew that the Europeans did not believe in the art of the people. Nonetheless, he was not deterred, but was committed and determined, to reproduce the works as he saw them. This success ended the initial error held by Europeans that no African person was capable of producing the kind of art works created by them. Onabolu‘s effort earned him a scholarship to read art in England and France. At the end of his study, he did not only excel as a painter par excellence, but carved a niche for himself. When Onabolu returned from studying overseas, Art was introduced to be taught in schools alongside other subjects. Despite initial difficulties faced as a result of lack of teachers, Onabolu was determined to succeed by moving from one school to the other to be personally involved in the teaching. Grillo in Ikpakronyi (2003) notes that Aina Onabolu had sacrificed so much for the survival of the subject when states thus: The period of inertia was during the period of Onabolu. Nobody appreciated what he was doing. He was going from school to school teaching and getting almost nothing and trekking from place to place. He lived more or less as a pauper. Well, relatively he didn’t have much and he died more or less just like a school teacher. His works of course are now being appreciated. The initiative by Aina Onabolu and those who later worked with him (Kenneth Murray, H. E. Duckwork, Dennis Duerden and J. D. Clarke), and the impact they made, perhaps prompted Konate (2004) to refer to them as ―instrumental figures‖. This feat marked the official use of conventional and academic European materials, techniques and styles of executing art works in Nigerian schools. The combined efforts of these art teachers produced budding and talented artists like J. D. Akeredolu, Akinola Lasekan, C. C. Ibeto, Ibrahim Uthman, A. P. Umana and Ben Enwonwu. These artists individually made their distinct landmarks in the propagation of visual arts. Aina Onabolu, however, apparently dominated the contemporary Nigerian art scene for about two decades from the 1920s to the 1940s, and he continued to dominate until his death in 1963. Today, he is generally not only regarded as the father of modern art and art education in Nigeria, but he lit the torch for a dynamic contemporary art in modern Nigeria. The subject was further strengthened, when Ben Enwonwu (1921-1994) who graduated from Slade School of Art in London, was appointed the Federal Art Advisor. He, like Aina Onabolu, was exceptionally talented and committed. He initiated and introduced a new concept (which was later known as natural synthesis) in his art expression. He dominated the Nigerian landscape with innovative works for about a decade (Babalola, 2004). he first set of students in the persons of Uche Okeke, Demas Nwoko, Bruce Onobrakpeya and others, were admitted into the Nigerian Collage of Arts, Science and Technology, Zaria (now Ahmadu Bello University)  in 1957. Art courses were made professional, based entirely on the conventional academics of the European approach. Ikpakronyi (2009) notes that the Europeans formed the bulk of the teaching staff and the programme came into real focus. The students who were not satisfied with the European style of expression sought to discontinue  with  the  conventional  approach.  They  gradually  continued  to   distance themselves from the Western artistic concepts and historical experiences that were alien to them. They felt the need to create an identity to the African artists. Those who spearheaded the desire for the change included Uche Okeke, Bruce Onobrakpeya, among others. On what appears to be a justification for the step they took, Onobrakpeya (2003), one of the frontiers of the Zarianists, states that the whole idea behind their activities was to save Nigerian civilization and to salvage the personality of her people from the inferiority complex which was the outcome of colonialism. He singled out Uche Okeke, who had experience in the documentation and collection of folk art pieces, as their leader and states thus: With his background, we were not surprise that Uche became the leader the now famous society while still at the college. The members of the society were guided by the synthesis concept, he advanced. Synthesis was recourse to the root of our timeless values, which should be married to equal good foreign values… It was in short, to create a rich artistic presence and a hopeful future. As the Zaria Art Society left the college and dispersed to different parts of Nigeria and abroad, the Synthesis Theory became cardinal in their practice as painters, sculptors, teachers, media artists etc. This widespread new artistic energy created a new renaissance, with respect to the artist and the art in general. Uche  Okeke  confirms   their  instructors‘   relegated   Nigerian  cultural   values  to   the background. He affirmed his leadership position of the Zaria Art Society when he also states thus: I was myself a member of the Zaria Art Society and its chairman from 1958 to 1961,…when most of its founding members graduated…The majority of our instructors were British or British trained and we students opposed to the system of teaching art subjects that ignored Nigerian cultural values, restricted their method of imparting art knowledge and their preoccupation with the study of nature, which in our view, was superficial. When the Zaria Art Society was formed, the group used to meet formally and informally to discuss the socio-cultural existence of the creative artists in the throes of change. Again, the leader (Uche Okeke) in an interview granted Chika Okeke on the 31st August 1997 stated, ―We wanted to show Nigerian art and also have a distinct Nigerian character rather than posturing as colonial transplant.‖ In another development, Oshinowo (2008), notes that the formation of the Zaria Art Society was founded on a profound desire for political freedom. He believes the formation fuelled the spirit of individualism in all members, and also infused in their minds national consciousness and cultural pride. The author explains further that the spirit of individualism culminated into a synthesis of indigenous and Western ideas. The philosophy of natural synthesis was intensified, which later influenced almost all succeeding generations of Nigerian artists and their art creations. Perhaps the doggedness of the students in creating new consciousness, which ushered in what Filani in Konate (2004), refers to as ―New African‖. In his study of the works of the graduates, Oloidi (2009) observes that the pioneering students had acquired aggressive artistic radicalization of the Zaria revolutionaries between 1958 and 1961. He observes that it prepared the foundation for a solid artistic standard in modern Nigerian art. Generations of artists keep expanding the boundaries of art expression as they seek new vocabularies, materials, and techniques that enable them address new concerns. Diarra (2017) contends that Africa‘s art scene is characterized by innovation and conceptual profundity which has paved way for the next generation. Materials of different backgrounds are used to create works to interpret and portray the society‘s socio-economic realities, political challenges, rich tradition and diverse beauty. For instance, the Zaria Art Society advocated Natural Synthesis for Art Expression which was a fusion of African motifs, concepts and techniques with Western ideas (Ekpo, 2010). This concept led to other experiments that developed with time. Individual artists over the years have appropriated different unconventional material and techniques to express their feelings. Explorations and experiments, earlier started in Zaria, brought radical reformation in art expression in Nigeria. Nwoko‘s sculptural work with other artists of the Zaria Art Society caught the attention of other contemporary Nigerian visual artists, who appropriated relevant materials to address issues of the moment. Worthy of note is the Nigerian civil war, one sad event that inspired artists with the Zaria Art Society members, particularly from the Eastern part of the country (such as Uche Okeke, Obiora Uchechukwu, Chike Aniakor) who used their creative abilities to react to the avoidance and the waste of the war. Sowole (2013) observes that Alex Nwokolo metamorphosed from the use of one medium to the other in his quest to be unique. The years of experiments in different media like Jean Dubuffet of France, has made his art expression stronger. The author sees Alex Nwokolo among the generation of Nigerian artists who have transited from one radical media to the other, yet is still making impact. Sowole quotes Nwokolo thus: The desire for change and the need to have a global perspective in my art instigated a stimulus for this current direction in the evolution of my work. The new experiment and materials offered me yet another opening to contribute to an existing international calligraphy…and media derived from everyday socio-cultural signs and symbolism, where elements are assembled and dissected on to a surface resulting in a hybrid painting and sculpture. In 1990, some young artists who christened themselves as Nogh-Nogh Art Group, a group which included Danjuma Kefas, Babalola Tunde, Ayo Aina, Lasisi Lamidi, among others, from the Fine Arts Department of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria became worried because of the attitude of the public towards the types of artworks created by them, as they mostly appropriated unconventional materials found in the environment. The group is experimental in nature, and has embarked on organizing periodic workshops, seminars and exhibitions of their works, with participants coming from all over the country. The peculiar nature of their art creations attracted sympathy from other members of the community. Most of those who shared in their ideology joined them in their regular meetings (Jari, 1994). It was in one of the meetings that the group adopted the name Nogh-Nogh Art Movement. The word ―Nogh-Nogh‖ is a derivation from the Nupe language, and means ―nonsense‖ (Jari 1994). According to Danjuma (2002) one of the leaders of the movement, stated that from inception the movement has always had unconventionality as its main goal. As the movement kept growing, other goals such as creation of forums for discussion, and for the propagation of the works of the members, were developed. Different found objects were adopted by the participants in their art creations. This policy of freedom of expression adopted by the movement has not only popularized the movement, but also attracted more members. Members are further encouraged to appropriate materials and styles they think can best express their feelings, and it did not seek to influence the adaptation of a particular approach by its members. The group encourages simplicity of materials in all aspects of its operation. Danjuma (1994) in his assessment of the activities of the group, contends that their activities have positive effects on the artistic thinking of people who have come into contact with them. Another artist known for his experimental work in various materials within Nigeria and beyond is the Ghanaian born sculptor, El Anatsui, who resides in Nigeria. Angie (2017) and Diarra (2017) have individually written and alluded that El Anatsui is one of Africa‘s most influential mixed-media artist, although he was trained as a sculptor. The artist has spent much time in Nigeria, teaching at the University of Nigeria Nssuka. He uses different unconventional materials as he could find them suitable and makes exquisite objects of stunning visual impact. More recently, El Anatsui turned to installation and more complex sewing techniques, which enable him to create art using unconventional materials like liquor bottle caps and discarded pieces of metals for his large-scale assemblage art. A Non-Governmental Organization striving hard to increase and develop the creative abilities of artists in Nigeria is the Bruce Onokbrakpeya Foundation (BOF). It is an artist-led organization formed in 1985, with a mission to engender the growth of art culture through the provision of opportunities for artists to improve themselves through skills acquisition and empowerment. Ekpo (2010) observes that since its inception, the Bruce Onokbrakpeya Foundation has been an enduring player in the visual arts scene in Nigeria. The Foundation, through its Annual Harmattan Workshop, encourages artists to use their creative powers through appropriating any materials and techniques at their disposal to create. Works produced at the end of the workshops are exhibited in different places. For example, it has organized the Amos Tutuola Show, Lagos (2000), participated in the Commonwealth Heads of State and Government Meeting (CHOGM) Exhibition, Abuja (2003), Art and Democracy Exhibition, Asaba (2004) and the Harvest of the Harmattan Retreat Exhibition organized in collaboration with the Pan Africa University, Lagos (2004). In 2012, the Foundation featured the works of 20 artists at the Exhibition Bruce and Harmattan Workshop Experiment at Kajino Station in Dakar, Senegal during the 2012 Biennial Conference. In 2005, another art group christened Art Is Everywhere emerged at the Nigerian art space. The leader of the group is Ayo Adewumi, a lecturer at the Institute of Management and Technology (IMT), Enugu. Membership of the group is made up of students and staff of different institutions who share their ideology. As the name implies, they believe that art is found everywhere and the environment has to be properly exploited. The group encourages its members to scavenge the aquatic, creeks, mountains and the streets for materials for art expression. Sowole (2003) in his study of the group, notes that their approach to art creation is at sharp contrast to the regular art studio environment. The author observes that their materials range from the wastes of electronic and electrical materials being assembled into sculptural pieces to the plastic waste combined with other materials into figural renditions. The emphasis of the content of the art of the group is on waste recycling and providing avenues for training young artists and the less privilege on how to make a living from recycling items. Since its inception, the concept has gained much acceptance and is expanding in scope. The group has adopted A Travelling Workshop Policy to create public awareness. The workshop has spread to places like Enugu, Jos, Kaduna, Zaria, Lagos, and Port Harcourt. Contemporary Nigerian artists who appropriate unconventional materials strive to sensitize the public on the viability of waste and found object as potent creative resources. They also facilitate its practical engagement to budding artists. Artists have continued in the search for the newest material and techniques using any kind of materials, including unconventional media and techniques, to create new aesthetics. Some sections of the public still see the use of unconventional media as a revolt against established standards of art creation (Gushem 2005).
Statement of the Problem
It true that bad economy of a country is one of the factors that affect creativity, but even when the economy is good, some artists enjoy expressing themselves appropriating waste products as their first choice. Today in Nigeria, art produced in unconventional materials largely comes from waste and discarded materials. Works in these materials are subjected to different interpretation. Odoja, Makinde, Ajiboye and Fajuyibe (2013) have expressed the view that ―waste or junks are considered to be useless, discarded materials that are no longer good enough and, therefore, need to be disposed as unwanted.‖ In the society, some people have developed a mind-set that any material found in a location designated as rubbish is concluded to have outlived its usefulness and is, therefore, irrelevant. People with that kind of mind-set see such work as inept and a fraudulent means of art creation. They consider the products as works without any artistic effort, even when elements and principles of design are applied. Gushem (2005), notes that, the use of waste for art creation (by people who have preconceived thoughts on what art should be), is contradicting and against established standards. Saliu (2005) admits that art products are capable of generating excitement as well as controversy. Vigorous enlightenment embarked upon (by art historians through their write-ups, groups like Bruce Onobrkpeya Foudation (BOF), Nogh-Nogh Art Group, Art is Everywhere Project among others, to draw attention to the potential of waste materials for art expression. The problem of the study is that there are still arguments for and against works of art created using unconventional materials in Nigeria. The conflicting views for or against art productions in these materials are clamoured by some viewers including some artists. This indeed is a controversy in the creative landscape. The study is therefore set to analyze, using the works of the artists under study, in order to come up with a clear position on the opposing opinions.
Aim and Objectives of the Study
The aim of the study is to encourage upcoming artists to be open-minded in the use of materials in their creative expression, while the specific objectives are to:
- examine the backgrounds of the artists being studied;
- investigate the motivation for their use of unconventional materials in art creations;
- interrogate what informed the artists‘ courage in art creations with unconventional materials;
- find out the relevance of the thematic concerns in their individual compositions;
- make comparative analysis of the materials the artists individually used; and to
- draw conclusion from the findings and suggesting direction of which creation of art work should take as regards to the use of materials.
Research Questions
The study makes use of research questions for the collection of the data. The following questions are formulated to guide the researcher towards the solutions to the problem, as recommended by Leuizinger (1976) and Egonwa (2012).
- What are the artistic backgrounds of the artists being studied?
- What motivated their use of unconventional materials their creations?
- What informed the artists‘ continuous art creations in unconventional materials?
- How relevant are the thematic concerns in their individual works?
- How similar or different are the materials and techniques the artists used?
- Which material is most suitable for art expression?
Justification of the Study
One of the challenges of the moment in art creation, is that imported art materials are expensive in the market. Artists who continuously depend on these imported materials are likely to be creatively frustrated and consequently rendered out of practice due to the cost of the importating the materials. The experience of the French Expressionist painter, Jean Dubuffet (1901) is a good example, when he explored and experimented with new and crude materials that were not popular at that time. The works were derided, hated and rejected. He and his colleagues took courage and kept exploring and experimenting. At the end, they came up better and stronger. It therefore, takes the courage of an artist to gather materials from unaccustomed environment and combine them in a new context. From the experience of Dubuffet (1901) the French Expressionist painter whose works were only later appreciated, Nogh-Nogh brought on those that come in contact with the group as expressed by Kefas (1994), and the success of the Art is Everywhere project, expressed by Odoh, George, Odoh, Nneka, Anikpe and Ekeke (2014), show art expression matures with constant explorations and experiments. The copiousness of the unconventional materials creates an opportunity for continuous experiment and exploration. Therefore, artists need to exploit their aesthetic potentials for their art creations. The artists would freely exercise their rights to freedom of expression, and discover new ways of transforming and representing new concepts.
Significance of the Study
The significant of the study is that manipulating waste and found objects (which constitute major materials used by the artists under study) into works of art, shows the innate creative potentials that such materials possess. Unconventional materials exist in diverse forms and are either man-made or naturally occurring. Generally, waste materials anywhere command global attention as a result of its role in environmental degradation. Growing concerns on climate change have made waste generation and management a topical issue. Perhaps this made Ganiyu (2011) to state that one of the concerns of the environmental scientist is the management of waste products, while another concern is to draw the attention of artists to the realization that every geographical location is rich in the copiousness of materials for artistic expression. Olbrantz (2006) is delighted that artists have explored the use of different industrial wastes in producing art forms that are not only visually appealing, but also environmentally friendly. In the search for creative fulfillment, artists who have seen the creative potentials of these materials have consistently explored the environment as a useful source of materials for creative concepts. The materials are available and obtained with ease; the cost of production is less; the materials provide new aesthetic windows for visual activities, thereby encouraging entrepreneurship among adherents of the concept. Also, recycling of materials into new contexts is encouraged.
Scope and Delimitation of the Study
In the search for self-expression and creative fulfillment, the artists have consistently experimented with wide range of materials as useful sources of ideas and materials. This indeed is a wide subject considering the number of artists practising with different media. Therefore, to carry out a comprehensive study of materials, there is the need to restrict the study to a manageable scope, hence the choice of unconventional materials. The study is further restricted to artists who remain consistent in using the unconventional materials for their expressions. Nine (9) artists trained as painters and now using unconventional materials to express themselves were selected. The study is delimited to their works in unconventional media that are accessible within Nigeria, most especially those in their studios, homes and galleries. The selected artists are Ayo Adewunmi, Ayo Aina, Ikechukwu Francis, Jerry Buhari, Mabel Chukwu, Ndidi Dike, Nkechi Nwosu Igbo, Nsikak Essien and Sussan Ogenyi Omagu. The reasons for the choice include: (i) constancy in the use of wastes in artistic production (ii) creativity use of waste materials into new and unique context (iii) courage in the continuous use of unconventional materials; and (iv) the fact that works produced addressed socio-political, religious, economic and environmental issues that impact on the lives of Nigerians.
This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research
AN ANALYSIS OF UNCONVENTIONAL MATERIALS USED FOR ART EXPRESSION BY NINE (9) SELECTED NIGERIAN ARTISTS>
Project 4Topics Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project
Chat Us on WhatsApp » 09132600555
DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:
09132600555 (Country Code: +234)
YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]
09132600555 (Country Code: +234)