ABSTRACT
This study investigated diabetes management regimens and effect of diabetes educational intervention on diabetics attending Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital(NAUTH), Nnewi. A total of 146 diabetics were interviewed with structured questionnaire to obtain information on their lifestyles, diabetes management, diabetes knowledge and compliance to management regimens. Diabetes educational intervention materials were developed to educate the subjects on 3 crucial areas of diabetes management- diet, exercise and drug. A sub-sample of 33 subjects with uncontrolled diabetes (fasting blood sugar >160 mg/dl) was followed up for 3 months to assess the immediate effect of the intervention on blood-sugar. Post intervention questionnaire interview was repeated on the subjects after two years of the intervention to assess the long term effect of the intervention. The subjects were predominantly non- insulin dependent (type 2) diabetics (96%) and a few insulin dependent (type1) diabetics (4%); 62 % females and 38% males. Majority (75.7%) of the subjects used drugs and diets for diabetes management, 7% used drugs alone,
0.7% used diet alone and 16.6% used liquid extract of bitter and pumpkin leaves in addition to drug and diet. Fifty seven percent of the subjects had poor diabetes knowledge while 43% had good diabetes knowledge. Similarly, 53% and 47% of the subjects had poor and good nutrition knowledge respectively. Diabetes knowledge had significant (p<05) effect on diabetes control. The subjects restricted the consumption of some carbohydrate foods like rice (10%) and garri (2%) and increased the consumption of unripe plantain (78%). Consumption of legumes was high; cowpea and its products ranked highest (82%) followed by bread fruit pottage (27%). Fruits mostly consumed were garden eggs (56%), avocado pear (27%), firm-ripped pawpaw (14%) and orange (9%). There was marked decrease in the intake of alcohol (17%) and cigarette (23%). Sixty-three percent (63%) of the subjects were either inactive or maintaining light physical activity in their daily life, while 37% were active. Controlled diabetes (Fasting blood sugar < 160 mg/dl) was significantly (p<0.05) higher among active subjects. The educational intervention had significant (p<0.05) effect on the blood-sugar levels of the subjects within 3 months of the intervention. There were positive lifestyle changes on the diabetics two years after the intervention. Diabetes knowledge significantly (p<0.05) improved from 43% to 57%. More subjects became more active, blood sugar control significantly (p<0.05) improved from 59% to 63%. Rigidity and monotony in their food consumption pattern became less and there was more diversification in their food selection.
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background to the Study
Diabetes Mellitus is a group of multi-system endocrine disorder characterized by a raised blood glucose concentration due to defects in insulin secretion or action or both (Chuwhak, Peupet & Ohwovoriole, 2002; Mathur, 2006). Diabetes occurs throughout the world. Mokdad, Ford & Bowman (2000) observed that an epidemic of diabetes mellitus was occurring worldwide and warned that communities in developing countries were now at greatest risk of the disease. Obesity and physical inactivity comprise an important worldwide epidemic that has been linked to the increased prevalence of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome (Carlos, 2008). It has been projected that by the year 2025 the current incidence of diabetes worldwide will double, with an inevitable and profound impact on global health care systems and budget (Williams, 2004). Lifestyles in resource poor countries are changing, putting population at much higher risk of diabetes. Nwosu (2000) noted an increase in the incidence of diabetes mellitus among Nigerians and observed that diabetes constitutes
10% of patients seen by General Practitioners in Anambra State of Nigeria.
Diabetes mellitus is recognized as type 1 or insulin dependent diabetes and type 2 or adult onset diabetes. In type 1 diabetes, the insulin production from the pancreas is virtually absent, patients must be managed with exogenous insulin in addition to dietary manipulation in an attempt to regulate blood glucose level. Type 2 diabetic patients may produce insulin that would be insufficient and ineffective in regulating blood glucose level, management could thus be with hypoglycemic drugs and/or diet. American Diabetes Association (ADA) opined that dietary management is crucial for all types of diabetes. The basic nutritional requirement of diabetic patient is the same as those of a non-diabetic. However, the regimentation of food intake is the
cornerstone of diabetic therapy. Timing of food intake, the caloric value of food ingested, the proportions and quality of carbohydrate, fat and protein are all-important aspect of the diet (ADA, 2004). The major principle is to reduce hyperglycemia, avoid hypoglycemia, and maintain appropriate weight. In an attempt to lower blood glucose, the patient should avoid easily absorbable simple carbohydrates and highly processed and refined foods. The levels of energy recommendation for a patient depends on the age, body weight and activity. During the National African Congress in 1994, the reconstruction and development programme in South Africa had specifically targeted diabetes as one of the chronic diseases in need of special attention.
The increasing prevalence worldwide of diabetes is associated with levels of modernization (Popkin, 1999). Apart from genetic implications, diabetes has been associated with changes in lifestyle such as migration from rural to urban settings, over-eating, sedentary habits, a change to high-fat diets, consumption of refined sugar with lower fibre diet, smoking, social and economic stress ( ADA, 2004).
Certainly, strategies on diabetes management need to focus on dietary and physical activity behavior. Evidence of successful control and prevention of type 2 diabetes was previously published from the Finish Diabetes Prevention Study (Lindstrom, Louheranta & Mannelin, 2003). In the study, 522 middle aged (40-65 years) over
weight individuals (BMI > 25 kg/m2) with impaired glucose tolerance were put
through an intervention programme consisting of weight loss, reduced total and saturated fat intake, increased dietary fibre and physical activity. Another study has demonstrated that behavioral interventions are more successful if they adopt ideas of informed choice and the acquisition of skills for self-management (Conor, 2003).
If diabetes-associated morbidity and mortality are to be reduced, establishing sustainable mechanisms to achieve good diabetic care is essential. Diet therapy is
known to be a primary therapy in the management of type 2 diabetes and vital injunctive in type 1 diabetes. This is because the type of food consumed by the patient plays a fundamental role in their glycaemic control (Rekha, 2000; ADA, 2004). It is imperative therefore that dieticians counsel diabetic patients appropriately, according to their social circumstances. This requires time to educate patients on the use of household measures and to point out the quantity of cheap but appropriate foods that are available locally.
1.2 Statement of the Problem
The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus around the world appears so dramatic as to have been characterized as an epidemic (Mokdad et al., 2000). Diabetes mellitus causes prolonged ill-health, imposes morbidity and mortality risks, and necessitates a change in lifestyle, with a meticulous daily routine and long-term self-care.
The cardiovascular complications of diabetes, which is also a leading cause of blindness, amputation and kidney failure, account for much of the social and financial burden of the disease (Williams, 2004). The prediction that diabetes incidence will double by the year 2025 indicates a parallel risk in cardiovascular related illness and death, an inevitable and profound impact on global health-care system and a rise in co- morbid diseases. The burden on the health-care system and budget are enormous. An expenditure of up to 13% of the world’s health-care budget is on diabetes care and high prevalence countries may be spending up to 40% of their budget annually (International Diabetes Federation, 2003). It is important to note that these estimates of a burden on national health-care are for type 2 diabetes only and do not, as yet, estimates the additional burden of cardiovascular disease associated with metabolic syndrome where clinical diabetes is not yet present.
The Nigerian diabetics, unlike their counterparts in developed countries, have extremely limited chances for achieving self-care living with diabetes because of their limited knowledge of nutrition (Osisianya, Delda, Ogbonnaya & Ogundana, 2006). The study reported a low nutrition knowledge among the diabetics and suggested that adequate nutrition education should be employed in diabetic counseling. Everybody claims to know about nutrition. In the face of nutritional ignorance, myths and quackery gained stronghold. To maximize the effect of chronic disease management programmes, patients must be empowered to self-help, a policy that has been shown to improve diabetic care (ADA, 2004).
ADA (2004) observed that drastic change from the traditional diet that consists of high fibre, high carbohydrate, low animal protein, generous vegetable and low saturated fat to the so-called western diet, with low fibre, high protein and high fat content has been implicated as one of the causative factors for the development of diabetes mellitus. Although allopathic drugs for management of this disorder are available in the market but the high cost and the need for prolonged use (Balkrishnan, 2004) have influenced the desire for alternative medicine. Coincidentally, intensive promotion of herbal medicine through exhibition, print and electronic media has greatly increased the awareness of medicinal potential of some local and common herbs, vegetables, fruits and spices even among the highly educated. The Diabetes Control and Complication Trial (DCCT, 1993) demonstrated that intensive blood sugar control delays the onset and slows the progression of diabetic complication. ADA (2004) advised that good diabetic management is more than blood sugar control and maintained that diabetic management with drugs only could not tackle some of the risk factors like obesity, hypertension and serum lipid level. Most diabetics skip the numerous locally available high fibre foods due to ignorance. Studies have reported improvement in blood sugar level of diabetic patients using high fibre diets (Osisanya et al., 2006; ADA, 2004; Tumilehto, Lindstrom & Eriksson, 2001). Strategies on diabetes management need to focus on dietary and physical activity behavior. The role of professional nutritionist is to positively guide the public on scientifically proven sound nutrition messages. There is therefore need to investigate the lifestyles and various management combinations used by diabetics in Anambra State in order to plan effective intervention measures.
1.3 Objective of Study
General Objective: The general objective of the study is to assess the diabetic’s lifestyles and management regimens and effect of diabetes educational intervention on diabetes care.
Specific Objectives:
The specific objectives of this study were as follows: to
1. assess the diabetes knowledge of the subjects.
2. determine the diabetic’s compliance to management regimen.
3. determine the lifestyle factors affecting diabetes control
4. develop appropriate diabetes educational intervention.
5. assess the immediate effect of intervention on the blood glucose.
6. assess the impact of the intervention on target population two years following the intervention.
1.4 Significance of the study
In order to reduce diabetes-associated morbidity and mortality, an evidence-based study of this kind is essential to establish factors militating against good diabetes control and to institute measures to enhance good diabetes care. Living with diabetes requires knowledge and experience. Diabetes management is not only an element of treatment but also a preventive treatment in itself for maintaining normal-glycemia (Tumilehto et al., 2001), hence the importance of investigating the various diabetes management regimens among diabetic patients in our locality. The present study will be beneficial in that it will highlight the major problems militating against good diabetes control as well as the factors facilitating good diabetes control and then institute diabetes educational intervention to enhance good diabetes care.
Highlighting the major problems militating against good diabetic control will guide the researcher on the area to emphasize in the educational intervention in order to enhance good diabetes care which will in turn enable the diabetics to:
– Maintain a good glycaemic control
– Prevent diabetic complications which are caused by “swings” in the blood glucose levels.
– Correct misinformation on diabetic management that abounds in our society
– Provide a positive guide to the diabetics and the public at large on scientifically proven sound nutrition message.
1.5 Definition of Key Terms
Gylycaemic control: means maintaining as near normal blood glucose level as possible (80 – 110 mg/d1)
Lifestyle behavior: means such habits as physical activity, drinking habits, smoking habits and eating habits including meal combinations and feeding pattern. Management protocol: means treatment guidelines that is suitable and socially acceptable
Diabetic complications: any additional development of ill-health as a result of the diabetes state, e.g. neuropathy, retinopathy, liver diseases, cardiovascular diseases, and others.
This material content is developed to serve as a GUIDE for students to conduct academic research
ASSESSMENT OF DIABETES MANAGEMENT REGIMENS AND EFFECT OF DIABETES EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTION AMONG DIABETICS ATTENDING NNAMDI AZIKIWE UNIVERSITY TEACHING HOSPITAL NNEWI ANAMBRA STATE, NIGERIA>
Project 4Topics Support Team Are Always (24/7) Online To Help You With Your Project
Chat Us on WhatsApp » 09132600555
DO YOU NEED CLARIFICATION? CALL OUR HELP DESK:
09132600555 (Country Code: +234)
YOU CAN REACH OUR SUPPORT TEAM VIA MAIL: [email protected]
09132600555 (Country Code: +234)